Maggie McCarty
Specialist in Housing Policy
David Randall Peterman
Analyst in Transportation Policy
The Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD) appropriations subcommittee is charged with providing annual appropriations for the Department of Transportation (DOT), Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and related agencies. The HUD budget generally accounts for the largest share of discretionary appropriations provided by the subcommittee. However, when mandatory funding is taken into account, DOT’s budget is larger than HUD’s budget, because it includes funding from transportation trust funds. Mandatory funding typically accounts for a little less than half of the bill total.
The President’s FY2013 budget requests $73.4 billion in new budget resources for DOT. The requested funding was $3.5 billion (5%) more than the amount provided for FY2012 (not counting $1.7 billion in FY2012 emergency funding). Both the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations have recommended roughly the same level of funding as in FY2012 (not counting the emergency funding). The House’s pending FY2013 THUD bill (H.R. 5972) would provide no funding for the Transportation Investments Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant program or for the high speed and intercity passenger rail development program, two priorities of the Administration. The pending Senate THUD bill (S. 2322) would fund the TIGER program and provide a minimal level of funding for high speed rail development ($100 million, compared to $1.0 billion requested). The Administration request proposed a restructuring of DOT surface transportation programs reflecting a reauthorization proposal (a similar proposal was included in last year’s request). The Appropriations Committees did not support the requested restructuring; Congress is currently considering its own reauthorization proposals for surface transportation.
The President’s FY2013 budget requests nearly $34 billion in net new budget authority for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in FY2013. This is about $4 billion less than was provided in FY2012. However, in terms of new appropriations for HUD’s programs and activities, the President’s budget actually requests an increase of more than $512 million compared to FY2012. The difference—a decrease in net budget authority vs. an increase in new appropriations—is attributable to an estimated increase in the amount of excess receipts available from the FHA insurance fund, which are used to offset the cost of the HUD budget. S. 2322 included about $35 billion in net new budget authority for HUD. That is about $1 billion more than the President’s request and over $2 billion less than was provided in FY2012. H.R. 5972 included $33.6 billion for HUD, which is less than the Senate proposed but more than the President requested.
The Administration has threatened to veto the pending House bill. In part this threat came because of the House’s overall discretionary funding level for FY2013, which is below the ceiling allowed for FY2013 in the Budget Control Act of 2011. Another stated reason for the threat is opposition to certain program funding levels in the bill, such as zeroing out the DOT TIGER and high speed rail programs and the HUD Choice Neighborhoods and Sustainable Communities programs, as well as cuts to HUD homeless assistance grants and other programs.
Date of Report: June 25, 2012
Number of Pages: 26
Order Number: R42578
Price: $29.00
Document available via e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To Order:
For email and phone orders, provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.
Follow us on TWITTER at http://www.twitter.com/alertsPHP or #CRSreports
Posts
