Search Penny Hill Press

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Budget “Sequestration” and Selected Program Exemptions and Special Rules


Karen Spar, Coordinator
Specialist in Domestic Social Policy and Division Research Coordinator

“Sequestration” is a process of automatic, largely across-the-board spending reductions under which budgetary resources are permanently canceled to enforce certain budget policy goals. It was first authorized by the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (BBEDCA, Title II of P.L. 99-177, commonly known as the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Act).

The sequestration process is of current interest because it was included as an enforcement mechanism in the Budget Control Act of 2011 (BCA, P.L. 112-25). Sequestration can also occur under provisions of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (Statutory PAYGO, Title I of P.L. 111-139). In either case, certain programs are exempt from sequestration, and special rules govern the effects of sequestration on others. For the most part, these provisions are found in Sections 255 and 256 of BBEDCA, as amended.

The following two components of the BCA could result in automatic sequestration: 

·         Establishment of discretionary spending limits, or caps, for each of FY2012- FY2021. If Congress appropriates more than allowed under these spending limits in any given year, the automatic process of sequestration will cancel the excess amount. 
          Failure of Congress to enact legislation developed by the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, by January 15, 2012, that reduces the deficit by at least $1.2 trillion. This would trigger a series of automatic spending reductions, including sequestration of mandatory spending in each of FY2013-FY2021, a one-year sequestration of discretionary spending for FY2013, and lower discretionary spending limits for each of FY2014-FY2021. 
On November 21, the Joint Committee announced that it would not meet the BCA’s deadline of November 23 to approve legislation to achieve the necessary savings, raising the likelihood that the automatic spending reductions will take effect, beginning in FY2013.

Under the Statutory PAYGO Act, sequestration is part of a budget enforcement mechanism that is intended to prevent enactment of mandatory spending and revenue legislation that would increase the federal deficit. The act requires the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to track costs and savings associated with enacted legislation and to determine at the end of each congressional session if net total costs exceed net total savings. If so, a sequestration will be triggered.

If sequestration is triggered—either under the BCA or Statutory PAYGO Act—the exemptions and special rules of Sections 255 and 256 of BBEDCA apply. Most exempt programs are mandatory, and include Social Security and Medicaid; refundable tax credits to individuals; and low-income programs such as the Children’s Health Insurance Program, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, and Supplemental Security Income. Some discretionary programs also are exempt, notably all programs administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Also, subject to notification of Congress by the President, military personnel accounts may either be exempt or reduced by a lower percentage.

Special rules also apply to several, primarily mandatory, programs. For example, under Section 256 of BBEDCA, Medicare may not be sequestered by more than 4%. However, if sequestration were triggered by the BCA, Medicare could be sequestered by no more than 2%.



Date of Report: November 23, 2011
Number of Pages:
26
Order Number: R4
2050
Price: $29.95

Follow us on TWITTER at
http://www.twitter.com/alertsPHP or #CRSreports

Document available via e-mail as a pdf file or in paper form.
To order, e-mail Penny Hill Press or call us at 301-253-0881. Provide a Visa, MasterCard, American Express, or Discover card number, expiration date, and name on the card. Indicate whether you want e-mail or postal delivery. Phone orders are preferred and receive priority processing.